BlueRanger
05-05-2009, 06:43 PM
I received an email from our Fisheries Biologist Jeff Roth today, and I'll reprint exactly what he said with the caveat that these are only his general impressions based on what he saw on the water. As I said before, the creel census will continue through the end of the ice season, so don't expect the formal report until next year. But hopefully he'll be willing to share more details of the survey results in a couple months after the data is analyzed.
Just recovering from the TFF survey. Many 15 hours days netting and shocking. We netted and [recaptured] the Manitowish River and Bonies Mound area where walleye spawn first even before the ice is out on the rest of the flowage. We then moved into Trude Lake and the rest of the flowage with the goal of having our work done before the opener. The data is extensive and I have not had a chance to go through it yet but can say that the walleye size structure in the flowage is as good or better than in the past. The size structure on Trude Lake "appears" worse than years ago, but this is just a "gut" reaction without direct data comparison. Walleye abundance appears higher but with smaller fish. The largest walleye sampled was 30 inches with the best size structure found in the "big water" area of the flowage. The majority (if not all) male walleyes ran 15 to 20 inches there. Doesn't get any better than that.
Musky were impressive with good total numbers and improved size structure. Many (%?) over 40 inches with numerous fish 45 to 49 inches. The largest fish so far at 49". We are still sampling for musky in a few areas and will be following up in a few weeks with a smallmouth bass sample.
Just recovering from the TFF survey. Many 15 hours days netting and shocking. We netted and [recaptured] the Manitowish River and Bonies Mound area where walleye spawn first even before the ice is out on the rest of the flowage. We then moved into Trude Lake and the rest of the flowage with the goal of having our work done before the opener. The data is extensive and I have not had a chance to go through it yet but can say that the walleye size structure in the flowage is as good or better than in the past. The size structure on Trude Lake "appears" worse than years ago, but this is just a "gut" reaction without direct data comparison. Walleye abundance appears higher but with smaller fish. The largest walleye sampled was 30 inches with the best size structure found in the "big water" area of the flowage. The majority (if not all) male walleyes ran 15 to 20 inches there. Doesn't get any better than that.
Musky were impressive with good total numbers and improved size structure. Many (%?) over 40 inches with numerous fish 45 to 49 inches. The largest fish so far at 49". We are still sampling for musky in a few areas and will be following up in a few weeks with a smallmouth bass sample.